• Law Office Sung

Startups Entering the U.S. Market 101 (3) – Vesting (ENG)


Conditional Incomplete Stock Grant (Vesting)

​Startups can issue outright stocks that can be exercised immediately, but they can also issue stocks on a vesting condition. Grantees of the outright stocks take a full ownership on the day they are granted and there is no risk of losing their stocks in the future. However, the grantees of the stocks on a vesting condition may have to forfeit their stocks or the company may repurchase their stocks if certain conditions are not met.

​Startup founders ideally want to receive the outright stocks of the company they own. If they work unpaid for the company, they feel even more reluctant to receive stocks on a vesting condition. However, startup founders need to understand that issuing stocks on a vesting condition from the initial issuance of stock may be in the best interest of both the company and the founders themselves.

First, there may be members who suddenly depart the company after receiving outright stocks without completing the role they initially promised. There is no guarantee that the startup founders’ unity will last forever. Often times, there might be a serious conflict between the founders over how they operate the company, and they may want to go their separate ways. Especially if the company performs poorly with no profits generating and no investments being made, some of the founders may want to relocate to a job that will pay them immediately. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that conflicts and divisions among the founders will not happen in the early stage of business, perhaps just one day after the stocks are issued. As a result, granting a full ownership of stocks after a certain period of time following the stock issuance (after the founders have completed some of their respective roles and tasks promised in exchange for stocks) is a way to minimize further conflicts.

​Second, if the situations mentioned above do occur, the company needs to seek a replacement for a member leaving the company. In such cases, if the company reissue stocks and grant it to the new member, the stocks of the founding members may be diluted. In other words, if a founding member of the company suddenly leaves the company after receiving a full stock, the remaining members will not only struggle to complete the incomplete tasks, but the value of their stocks will be lowered, and it causes an unfair consequence.

Finally, investors prefer companies that issued stocks on a vesting condition. Many VCs cannot help but to take into consideration the startup founders’ skills, ability, and commitment to the company when selecting companies to invest in. They obviously seek to invest in a startup with founders who have strong motivations for success rather than a startup with founders who already have outright stocks and can leave the company whenever they want or a startup that allows certain members to freeride off of other employees’ efforts. As a result, in the long run, if a startup wants to attract VCs or other institutions, it is ideal for the company to consider issuing stocks on a vesting condition.

Recent Posts

See All

스타트업의 지분 배분 (Stock Allocation)

2021. 5. 10. 둘 이상의 창업자들이 함께 설립한 기업의 경우 거의 항상 지분을 어떻게 배분할 것이냐에 대한 이슈가 생긴다. 물론 최초의 창업시점부터 함께한 창업자들이라면 1/n으로 지분을 나누면 깔끔하지 않냐고 반문할 수 있겠지만 각자의 역할과 기여도를 고려하지 않고 단순히 최초에 같이 시작했다는 이유만으로 전부 동일한 지분을 나눠가지는 것은 장

미국 저작권 등록하기 (Registering a Copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office)

2021. 4. 26. 이전의 AI와 IP (저작권) 관련한 글에서 저작권 등록은 필수는 아니지만 다음과 같은 장점들이 있음을 소개한 바 있다. 첫째, 저작물 출판 후 3개월 이내 또는 저작권 침해 행위에 앞서 저작권을 등록할 경우, 저작권자가 소송에서 법정 손해와 변호사 비용도 청구할 수 있다. 반면에 출판 후 3개월 이내에 등록하지 않았거나 실제 저작권