• Law Office Sung

The Effect of Regulatory Changes on the Self-Driving Automotive Industry (ENG)

2020. 11. 1.


From the standpoint of car manufacturers, self-driving (autonomous driving) technologies have been developed to some extent. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), Emergency Braking, and Collison Avoidance Systems using ultrasound and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technologies have already been introduced to new cars at reasonable prices, as a result, they achieve a significant level of self-driving. Of course, the cost of hardware and software is not yet quite affordable to most ordinary customers, but the commercialization of fully autonomous vehicles is no longer a distant future. Existing car manufacturers, as well as giant IT companies and numerous startups with technological prowess, are spending enormous time and development costs to bring the technology closer to perfection in order to lead the self-driving market.

Today, in this article, we discuss changes in regulations that are likely to have a significant impact on the expansion of the self-driving car industry. Although regulations may vary fundamentally from country to country or from state to state, this article looks at the overall regulations. Changes in regulations that will have the greatest impact on the self-driving car industry in the future include 1) whether or not to allow public transportation carriers to receive transportation fees, and 2) the clarification of the scope of responsibility between car manufacturers, passengers (including drivers), and insurance companies.

As mentioned earlier, even if self-driving cars are generally commercialized, it is highly likely that the cost of self-driving cars will be burdensome for the majority of customers in the beginning. Considering that only three or four decades ago, the concept of privately owned cars meant considerable wealth in Korea, it is highly likely that self-driving cars will connote a similar meaning at first. Therefore, there is a high possibility that self-driving cars will be mostly used by public transportation companies (taxi or Uber) in the early stages of commercialization. In the United States, many states do not yet allow companies to receive transportation fees for transporting the public by self-driving vehicles. As a result, it is difficult for companies that want to operate self-driving transportations to invest largely in research and development as it is a risky project until the above regulations change. The governments will attempt to ease regulations in the future in terms of tax revenue expansion, but how long it will take and how much stability the technology will have in the meantime will act as a big variable.

Another essential change necessary in regulations is to present clear rules on the responsibility part of accidents. The topic is constantly being discussed, but clear rules are not established yet. Individuals or corporations that own self-driving cars will want to have liability insurance that will completely exempt them from accidents that occur during autonomous driving. On the other hand, insurance companies will carefully exam whether the cause of the accident was due to the vehicle (hardware or software) malfunction or due to the driver’s inadequate maintenance, and whether the other party's (driver or pedestrian) behavior provided an unavoidable cause of the accident with a state-of-the-art technology. After much examination in the case, the insurance company will then decide whether to pay the insurance and how much. During the process, a number of lawsuits are also expected between each party’s insurance company and manufacturers to determine who is ultimately responsible. If the current state law gradually changes from the current method of calculating the driver's fault ratio to the method of strict liability of manufacturers and suppliers for autonomous vehicles, the consumers will eventually experience the cost of the above liability being passed on to them when sellers price the vehicles. Relevant authority, such as FTC, needs to properly monitor this situation, and also pay close attention to consumer protection.

In conclusion, it is necessary to discuss and prepare for changes in regulations that balance 1) the development of innovative self-driving technologies and the promotion of the expansion of the automobile industry, and 2) the guarantee of sufficient safety as it is directly related to public safety. The discussion should be careful, but it should not take too long.

Recent Posts

See All

미국 법인설립 Corporation vs LLC (Tax)

2021. 2. 24. 미국진출을 계획하고 있는 한국의 기업들이 가장 먼저 그리고 많이 질문하시는 내용 중 하나가 바로, Corporation과 LLC 중 어느 Entity를 설립하는 것이 유리할 것인가이다. 이전에 Incorporation에 대한 설명을 하면서, 이미 한국에서 설립 후 미국에 진출을 생각하는 대부분의 스타트업은, Corporation의 두

Strategic IP Monetization (수익화)

2021. 2. 22. 무형자산(Intangible assets)은 일반적으로 기업의 성장과 함께 생성되곤 하는데, 해당 무형자산이 기업의 비즈니스에 핵심적인 역할을 하는 특허인 경우도 있지만 핵심 중요자산이 아닌 부수적인 자산인 경우도 많다. 이런 경우 많은 기업들은 해당 무형자산에 자산가치를 두지 않고 수익화(Monetization) 방안에 대해 적극적

미국 상표 출원 이의신청 (Opposition)

2021. 2. 9. 미국 특허상표청(USPTO)에 접수된 상표출원이 심사관에 의하여 사전 승인을 받았다면, 그 후로 30일 동안 해당 상표의 등록에 반대입장을 표시하고자 하는 자는 이의신청을 접수할 수 있다. 위 30일의 기간은 연장신청을 할 경우 특별한 사유가 없더라도 추가 30일이 연장되며, 특별한 사유가 있을 경우에는 최대 90일까지 연장이 가능하다

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

©2020 by Law Office of Kiwon Sung. All Rights Reserved.