• Law Office Sung

The Effect of Regulatory Changes on the Self-Driving Automotive Industry (ENG)

2020. 11. 1.


From the standpoint of car manufacturers, self-driving (autonomous driving) technologies have been developed to some extent. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), Emergency Braking, and Collison Avoidance Systems using ultrasound and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technologies have already been introduced to new cars at reasonable prices, as a result, they achieve a significant level of self-driving. Of course, the cost of hardware and software is not yet quite affordable to most ordinary customers, but the commercialization of fully autonomous vehicles is no longer a distant future. Existing car manufacturers, as well as giant IT companies and numerous startups with technological prowess, are spending enormous time and development costs to bring the technology closer to perfection in order to lead the self-driving market.

Today, in this article, we discuss changes in regulations that are likely to have a significant impact on the expansion of the self-driving car industry. Although regulations may vary fundamentally from country to country or from state to state, this article looks at the overall regulations. Changes in regulations that will have the greatest impact on the self-driving car industry in the future include 1) whether or not to allow public transportation carriers to receive transportation fees, and 2) the clarification of the scope of responsibility between car manufacturers, passengers (including drivers), and insurance companies.

As mentioned earlier, even if self-driving cars are generally commercialized, it is highly likely that the cost of self-driving cars will be burdensome for the majority of customers in the beginning. Considering that only three or four decades ago, the concept of privately owned cars meant considerable wealth in Korea, it is highly likely that self-driving cars will connote a similar meaning at first. Therefore, there is a high possibility that self-driving cars will be mostly used by public transportation companies (taxi or Uber) in the early stages of commercialization. In the United States, many states do not yet allow companies to receive transportation fees for transporting the public by self-driving vehicles. As a result, it is difficult for companies that want to operate self-driving transportations to invest largely in research and development as it is a risky project until the above regulations change. The governments will attempt to ease regulations in the future in terms of tax revenue expansion, but how long it will take and how much stability the technology will have in the meantime will act as a big variable.

Another essential change necessary in regulations is to present clear rules on the responsibility part of accidents. The topic is constantly being discussed, but clear rules are not established yet. Individuals or corporations that own self-driving cars will want to have liability insurance that will completely exempt them from accidents that occur during autonomous driving. On the other hand, insurance companies will carefully exam whether the cause of the accident was due to the vehicle (hardware or software) malfunction or due to the driver’s inadequate maintenance, and whether the other party's (driver or pedestrian) behavior provided an unavoidable cause of the accident with a state-of-the-art technology. After much examination in the case, the insurance company will then decide whether to pay the insurance and how much. During the process, a number of lawsuits are also expected between each party’s insurance company and manufacturers to determine who is ultimately responsible. If the current state law gradually changes from the current method of calculating the driver's fault ratio to the method of strict liability of manufacturers and suppliers for autonomous vehicles, the consumers will eventually experience the cost of the above liability being passed on to them when sellers price the vehicles. Relevant authority, such as FTC, needs to properly monitor this situation, and also pay close attention to consumer protection.

In conclusion, it is necessary to discuss and prepare for changes in regulations that balance 1) the development of innovative self-driving technologies and the promotion of the expansion of the automobile industry, and 2) the guarantee of sufficient safety as it is directly related to public safety. The discussion should be careful, but it should not take too long.

Recent Posts

See All

미국 연방 상표등록의 일반적인 거절사유 4가지

2021. 6. 17. 미국 특허상표청(USPTO)이 상표등록을 거절할 수 있는 근거는 수 없이 많다 (TMEP Chapter 1200장 참조). 통계상으로 출원된 5건 중 평균 1건은 등록이 거절된다고 한다. 선등록 상표에 대한 검색부터 출원서 작성 과정에서 들어가는 비용과 시간을 고려할 경우, 출원인들은 가능한한 등록가능성이 가장 높은 상표를 선택하

스타트업과 스톡옵션(Stock Option)(Part 2)

2021. 6. 8. 언제 옵션을 행사하여 현금화할 수 있을까? ​ 일반적으로 자산유동화(liquidity) 이벤트가 발생하는 경우 옵션을 행사하고 현금으로 전환할 수 있다. 가장 대표적인 경우가 IPO(기업상장)이다. 만약 내가 스톡옵션을 가지고 있는 회사가 주식시장에 상장된다면 옵션을 행사하여 취득한 주식을 매각할 수 있다. 또 다른 경우로는 회사

스타트업과 스톡옵션(Stock Option)(Part 1)

2021. 6. 3. 직원들에게 충분한 급여를 지급할 충분한 재정능력이 없는 수많은 스타트업들은 우수한 인재들을 유치하기 위하여 스톡옵션(stock option)이라는 유인을 활용하곤 한다. 스톡옵션을 부여받는 직원 입장에서도 지금 당장 충분한 급여를 받지 못하더라도 초기단계의 스타트업에 입사하는데 큰 인센티브가 될 수 있다. 그러나 스톡옵션을 받는 직