• Law Office Sung

AI and Law - AI Tech Transaction Agreement (part 2) (ENG)

Limitation of Liability


​Almost all license agreements include the "Limitation of Liability" clause. There are usually two steps of limiting damages. The first is limiting the liability for indirect, consequential, and incidental damages (i.e. type of damages) and the second is limiting the liability to a certain amount (i.e. liability cap) even if direct and general damages are occurred. It usually multiplies the fee paid by Licensee. For Licensor, it is advantageous to define both steps of liability, while for Licensee, it is advantageous to carefully consider the second step of liability even if they acknowledge the first one. This is because, if the Licensee ultimately provides the service to consumers, the Licensee may be required to assume unlimited liability to consumers of that service (especially for general individual consumers).

​However, if the Licensee request that the liability cap should be lifted altogether, the negotiations are likely to be stalled. Even if there are restrictions on the types of damages in the agreement, it is very difficult to clearly distinguish between direct damages and other special damages (such as indirect, consequential, incidental damages, etc.) unless a lawsuit is filed, and the above restrictions in the agreement often do not function properly in practice. As a result, in reality, lawyers often include all the ambiguities of the damages in the agreement at first and engage in intense negotiations between the parties with a final share (ex. 60 percent to 40 percent) after. The presence of restriction on the amount is a crucial bargaining point for the Licensor, so it is highly likely that they will not yield this clause, and deciding the specific amount of liability cap will be the main battling point.

The process will be more intense especially for AI technology licenses. In AI technology transactions, failures or malfunctions in hardware or systems can cause very serious consequences. For example, if a system that collects and analyzes highly sensitive personal information, such as one's medical history, is down and the information is exposed unencrypted to other users, the amount of damages required as a result of class action suits can be enormous and it will be difficult for Licensors to expect to bear these risks indefinitely.

Insurance


​Even in general technology license agreements, it often requires either or all of the parties to purchase appropriate insurance. For instance, a performance bond insurance serves to protect the other party if either party fails to perform its contractual obligations (including liability for damages). Of course, the types of insurance required will vary depending on the needs and types of contracts for each party. Typical insurance includes the comprehensive general liability, employer's liability, and workers' compensation, in addition to performance bond insurance or maintenance bond insurance.

​The importance of insurance increases in areas that are just being explored, such as AI technology. When damage or loss occurs due to an event, revealing the causal link between the event and the loss is the basis of the compensation but people still lack experience in identifying the causal link. Until sufficient experience is built up, the causal link between most events and losses will often be concluded unclearly, and as a result, people will rely more on insurance.

However, there are no specific data or research results on how the previously mentioned AI system can cause casualties or property damage to third parties. Insurers will also need empirical research on which damages can be caused during the data collection, accumulation (storage), and analysis process in which AI systems operate. They need to classify errors, 1) in the collection stage, 2) in the storage stage, 3) in the analysis stage, and therefore, more and more data experts are getting employed for the job.

For the parties signing the agreement, it will be necessary to examine whether the insurance product to which they purchase can cover the damage caused by the AI system (or if it should be recognized as force majeure) and whether the coverage amount is sufficient to cover the loss or damages. In addition, it is also recommended to check if the other party’s insurance protects me appropriately in case the other party fails to perform or pay, and whether receiving double protection from more than one insurance is necessary.

Recent Posts

See All

미국 저작권 침해 대응방법

2021. 7. 16. 미국 저작권법(17 U.S.C. §106)은 저작권자에게 작품(저작물)에 대한 배타적 독점권을 제공한다. 제3자가 저작권자의 허락 없이 다음 중 어느 하나 이상의 행위를 할 경우 저작권 침해행위가 있었다고 말할 수 있다. ​ - 작품을 베끼거나 복제 - 원작으로부터 파생 작품을 창작 - 작품이나 작품의 사본에 대한 최초의 판매 또는

미국 스타트업 취업규칙(Employee Handbook) 제정시 주의점

2021. 7. 12. 미국에 법인을 설립하고 현지 직원도 여러명 채용하였다면 반드시 취업규칙(Employee Handbook)을 만드는 것이 좋다. 미국에서는 채용과정에서 오퍼레터(offer letter) 만으로 채용이 완료되는 경우가 많고 별도로 회사-직원 간에 고용계약서(employment agreement)를 작성하지 않는 경우도 흔하다. ​

Technology Licensing(기술 실시 허락)의 4가지 중요사항

2021. 6. 29. 지식재산권(IP)의 중요성과 자산으로서의 가치에 대하여는 이미 여러 글을 통하여 다양하게 다루었다. 기업은 자신의 제품이나 서비스의 무단도용을 저지하고 상대방의 IP 침해 공격에 대한 방어 목적으로 IP를 취득할 수도 있고, 자신의 IP에 근거하여 경쟁사를 무너뜨리거나 더 높은 시장 점유율을 차지하며 지리적인 시장을 장악하기 위한