• Law Office Sung

Startups Entering the U.S. Market 101 (3) – Vesting (ENG)


Conditional Incomplete Stock Grant (Vesting)

​Startups can issue outright stocks that can be exercised immediately, but they can also issue stocks on a vesting condition. Grantees of the outright stocks take a full ownership on the day they are granted and there is no risk of losing their stocks in the future. However, the grantees of the stocks on a vesting condition may have to forfeit their stocks or the company may repurchase their stocks if certain conditions are not met.

​Startup founders ideally want to receive the outright stocks of the company they own. If they work unpaid for the company, they feel even more reluctant to receive stocks on a vesting condition. However, startup founders need to understand that issuing stocks on a vesting condition from the initial issuance of stock may be in the best interest of both the company and the founders themselves.

First, there may be members who suddenly depart the company after receiving outright stocks without completing the role they initially promised. There is no guarantee that the startup founders’ unity will last forever. Often times, there might be a serious conflict between the founders over how they operate the company, and they may want to go their separate ways. Especially if the company performs poorly with no profits generating and no investments being made, some of the founders may want to relocate to a job that will pay them immediately. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that conflicts and divisions among the founders will not happen in the early stage of business, perhaps just one day after the stocks are issued. As a result, granting a full ownership of stocks after a certain period of time following the stock issuance (after the founders have completed some of their respective roles and tasks promised in exchange for stocks) is a way to minimize further conflicts.

​Second, if the situations mentioned above do occur, the company needs to seek a replacement for a member leaving the company. In such cases, if the company reissue stocks and grant it to the new member, the stocks of the founding members may be diluted. In other words, if a founding member of the company suddenly leaves the company after receiving a full stock, the remaining members will not only struggle to complete the incomplete tasks, but the value of their stocks will be lowered, and it causes an unfair consequence.

Finally, investors prefer companies that issued stocks on a vesting condition. Many VCs cannot help but to take into consideration the startup founders’ skills, ability, and commitment to the company when selecting companies to invest in. They obviously seek to invest in a startup with founders who have strong motivations for success rather than a startup with founders who already have outright stocks and can leave the company whenever they want or a startup that allows certain members to freeride off of other employees’ efforts. As a result, in the long run, if a startup wants to attract VCs or other institutions, it is ideal for the company to consider issuing stocks on a vesting condition.

Recent Posts

See All

미국 연방 상표등록의 일반적인 거절사유 4가지

2021. 6. 17. 미국 특허상표청(USPTO)이 상표등록을 거절할 수 있는 근거는 수 없이 많다 (TMEP Chapter 1200장 참조). 통계상으로 출원된 5건 중 평균 1건은 등록이 거절된다고 한다. 선등록 상표에 대한 검색부터 출원서 작성 과정에서 들어가는 비용과 시간을 고려할 경우, 출원인들은 가능한한 등록가능성이 가장 높은 상표를 선택하

스타트업과 스톡옵션(Stock Option)(Part 2)

2021. 6. 8. 언제 옵션을 행사하여 현금화할 수 있을까? ​ 일반적으로 자산유동화(liquidity) 이벤트가 발생하는 경우 옵션을 행사하고 현금으로 전환할 수 있다. 가장 대표적인 경우가 IPO(기업상장)이다. 만약 내가 스톡옵션을 가지고 있는 회사가 주식시장에 상장된다면 옵션을 행사하여 취득한 주식을 매각할 수 있다. 또 다른 경우로는 회사

스타트업과 스톡옵션(Stock Option)(Part 1)

2021. 6. 3. 직원들에게 충분한 급여를 지급할 충분한 재정능력이 없는 수많은 스타트업들은 우수한 인재들을 유치하기 위하여 스톡옵션(stock option)이라는 유인을 활용하곤 한다. 스톡옵션을 부여받는 직원 입장에서도 지금 당장 충분한 급여를 받지 못하더라도 초기단계의 스타트업에 입사하는데 큰 인센티브가 될 수 있다. 그러나 스톡옵션을 받는 직